A Reply to Professor Wang

A reply to Professor Seedhouse.

This brief reply gives a few references and clarifies some points in order to emphasize that a number of Professor Seedhouse's assertions are debatable and that his criticism of slovenly scholarship and his unbridled ad hominem argumentation are out of place and easily refuted.

Reply to Wang and Zhang.

1. An additional updated literature search had been conducted by the authors (D. Menzies and H. Hussain) to identify additional studies that had been published since the last systematic review and might otherwise have been included in the individual patient data (IPD). Of 523 titles identified, 30 were selected for full text review. Thirteen were additional reports on the cohorts that were alre...

Reply to Wang and Liang.

TO THE EDITOR—We thank Drs Wang and Liang for their comments. Mass drug administration (MDA) is not sustainable even in the short term and should not be advocated. Numerous epidemiological studies from around the world, dating back to the early 1980s, have shown that the impact of praziquantel on the prevalence, intensity, and morbidity of disease is short-lived and that in highly endemic areas...

Wang and Brady Reply.

The Uniform Commercial Code: A Reply to Professor Beutel